INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION STUDIES, vol.15, no.5, pp.132-145, 2022 (Peer-Reviewed Journal)
The study aims to examine the effect of the Four Square Writing Method
(FSWM) on the writing anxiety of the learners of Turkish as a foreign
language at the B2 level. The mixed-methods sequential explanatory
design was applied, and 50 students at the B2 proficiency level who
studied at the Turkish Teaching Practice and Research Center (BAİBU
TÖMER) at Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University in the 2020-2021 academic
year were selected through the purposeful sampling. The quantitative
data were obtained with a weak experimental design consisting of a
pre-test and a post-test, while the qualitative data consisted of
interviews with the participants. As data collection instruments, the
Writing Anxiety Scale (WAS) developed by Şen and Boylu (2017) and the
Semi-Structured Interview Form designed by the researchers were used.
Quantitative data were analyzed by hypothesis testing, whereas
qualitative data were scrutinized using content analysis. The
quantitative data showed that the FSWM had a statistically significant
effect on the writing anxiety of the learners of Turkish as a foreign
language. On the other hand, the qualitative findings were categorized
into two main themes: “writing skills” and “affectivity.” The writing
skills category included 13 codes and 72 views; “general, transition,
and linking expressions, developing strategies, developing thinking
skills, learning vocabulary, enhancing writing style, planning in
writing, graphic organizer, drafting, collaborative writing,
organization, writing quality, and generating ideas. The affectivity
category consisted of 5 codes and 31 views, including relaxation,
enjoyment, motivation, increased self-confidence, and dislike. The
findings determined that the FSWM played a role in positively affecting
writing anxiety, contributing to the development of writing skills,
promoting participants’ psychological comfort, allowing them to have a
fun time, gaining self-confidence, and motivating them to write. Lastly,
the study detailed the aspects where the qualitative findings supported
the quantitative results contributing to the interpretation of the
data.