High Ki-67 as an independent prognostic factor in extraskeletal osteosarcoma: a comparative cohort study


Bükün H. O., EVRENSEL T., ÇUBUKÇU E., DELİGÖNÜL A., ŞAHİN A. B., ÖZÇELİK E. E., ...Daha Fazla

BMC Cancer, cilt.26, sa.1, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 26 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1186/s12885-026-16120-0
  • Dergi Adı: BMC Cancer
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Extraskeletal osteosarcoma, Immunohistochemistry, Ki67, Osteosarcoma, Prognosis, Survival analysis
  • Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: The objectives of this study are to compare clinicopathological features and outcomes of extraskeletal osteosarcoma (EOS) and conventional osteosarcoma (COS) and identify independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: This study included 72 patients (Group EOS, n = 12; Group COS, n = 60) with a definitive diagnosis. Clinicopathological variables, SATB2 expression, and Ki-67 proliferation index were compared between groups. Outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test, and independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. Results: Group EOS had significantly higher median age (53.5 vs. 33.4 years, p < 0.001) and Ki-67 proliferation index than Group COS. Primary tumor location differed significantly (p < 0.001), with EOS cases affecting internal organs (kidneys, lungs) and COS cases mainly in long bones around the knee. Metastases were more common in Group EOS (83.3% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001). Median OS and DFS for Group EOS were 19.3 months (vs. 71.6 months for COS, p = 0.007) and 2.2 months (vs. 21.6 months for COS, p < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age (OS: HR per year 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.06, p < 0.001; DFS: HR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02–1.05, p < 0.001) and Ki-67 proliferation index (OS: HR per %-point 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.04, p = 0.038; DFS: HR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.04, p = 0.006) as independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Survival outcomes for patients with EOS were significantly worse than for those with COS. High Ki-67 proliferation index and advanced age were associated with a more aggressive clinical course of EOS. Therefore, more intensive follow-up and treatment are prudent for elderly EOS patients with a high Ki-67 proliferation index.