Effects of uridine and nucleotides on hemostasis parameters


Arı M., SAĞDİLEK E., KILINÇ E., CANSEV M., Özlük K.

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, cilt.55, sa.4, ss.626-633, 2023 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 55 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s11239-023-02793-y
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.626-633
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Aggregometer, Platelets, Thromboelastogram, UDP, UTP, NEUTROPHIL EXTRACELLULAR TRAPS, PLATELET ACTIVATION, P2Y(12) RECEPTOR, ANTAGONIST, ADP, ADENOSINE, IMMUNITY, ADENINE, PLASMA
  • Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Several purinergic receptors have been identified on platelets which are involved in hemostatic and thrombotic processes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of uridine and its nucleotides on platelet aggregation and hemostasis in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and whole blood. The effects of uridine, UMP, UDP, and UTP at different final concentrations (1 to 1000 µM) on platelet aggregation were studied using an aggregometer. In PRP samples, platelet aggregation was induced by ADP, collagen and epinephrine 3 min after addition of uridine, UMP, UDP, UTP and saline (as a control). All thromboelastogram experiments were performed at 1000 µM final concentrations of uridine and its nucleotides in whole blood. UDP and UTP were also tested in thromboelastogram with PRP. Our results showed that UDP, and especially UTP, inhibited ADP- and collagen-induced aggregation in a concentration-dependent manner. In whole blood thromboelastogram experiments, UDP stimulated clot formation while UTP suppressed clot formation. When thromboelastogram experiments were repeated with PRP, UTP’s inhibitory effect on platelets was confirmed, while UDP’s stimulated clot forming effect disappeared. Collectively, our data showed that UTP inhibited platelet aggregation in a concentration-dependent manner and suppressed clot formation. On the other hand, UDP exhibited distinct effects on whole blood or PRP in thromboelastogram. These data suggest that the difference on effects of UTP and UDP might have arisen from the different receptors that they stimulate and warrant further investigation with regard to their in vivo actions on platelet aggregation and hemostasis.