Sign language in deaf-and-hard-of-hearing education: comparing Sweden and Türkiye


YAZÇAYIR G., Holmstrom I.

JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION, 2026 (SSCI, Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1093/jdsade/enag033
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, CINAHL, EBSCO Education Source, Education Abstracts, Educational research abstracts (ERA), EMBASE, ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), MEDLINE, MLA - Modern Language Association Database, Psycinfo, MLA International Bibliography, EBSCO Communication Source, Social Science Premium Collection (ProQuest), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO), Communication Source (EBSCO), Education Collection (ProQuest), Education Source Ultimate (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Pharma Collection (ProQuest)
  • Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

This qualitative multiple-case study compares perceptions and practices of sign language in Sweden and T & uuml;rkiye across special schools and mainstream settings. Sweden represents a well-established bilingual model, whereas T & uuml;rkiye illustrates a nascent ecosystem where the formal integration of sign language into educational policy is relatively recent. This study is guided by the overarching research question: What are the perceptions and practices associated with sign language within the education systems of Sweden and T & uuml;rkiye? Data from 6 school authorities, 51 teachers, 10 parents, and 9 students were collected via interviews/open-ended questionnaires, observations, and document analysis; thematic and cross-case analyses were conducted. The results showed that Swedish participants prioritized language rights, identity, and language status. In T & uuml;rkiye, although most people supported access at an early age, oralist concerns related to speech sometimes prevailed. Sign language played a central role in Swedish schools for deaf-and-hard-of-hearing students and was included as a subject/support in mainstream schools. In T & uuml;rkiye, its use was limited due to teachers' fluency, heterogeneous classes, and speech-first norms. In both countries, families and teachers needed to strengthen their sign language proficiency, set an example for school authorities in its use, and provide resources, while sign language-supported materials and curricula were necessary.