Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
ICEARCH’25 4th INTERNATIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE CONFERENCE, Trabzon, Türkiye, 17 - 18 Mayıs 2025, cilt.1, sa.1, ss.556-566, (Tam Metin Bildiri)
Abstract. In the past decades, Green Building Rating Systems (GBRS) have been developed by many countries
and organizations around the world to assess, evaluate and certify the performance of green buildings. Some GBRS
have been adopted in different sites around the globe, some GBRS have been developed for a specific country.
This study aims to compare Green Building Rating System (GBRS) from different backgrounds, to identify the
factors of the background in developing similarities, differences, strengths and weaknesses of each GBRS. Namely
from globally used GBRS represented by LEED, national GBRS from developed countries represented by
Germany's DGNB, national GBRS from developing countries represented by Indonesia's Greenship, and South
Africa’s SBAT. To achieve these goals, three steps were taken. The first step is the comparison of the general
information of each GBRS, followed by the second step with the comparison of the categories and criteria carried
out by each GBRS. To deepen the comparison, LEED, DGNB, Greenship, and SBAT were adopted to evaluate
Jakarta International Stadium (JIS) and clearly identify the similarities, differences, strengths, and weaknesses of
each GBRS. From the analysis, it was revealed that the different background of the GBRS resulted in different
emphasis of the certification categories and criteria. This difference was considered important in the process of
selecting the GBRS to be adopted in the building, as reference to a particular GBRS can influence different
emphases in the design.
Keywords: Green building rating system, LEED, DGNB, Greenship, SBAT for Stadia, Sustainable development,
Green Building