The MTT assay yields a relatively lower result of growth inhibition than the ATP assay depending on the chemotherapeutic drugs tested


Ulukaya E., Ozdikicioglu F. , ORAL H. B. , Demirci M.

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, vol.22, no.1, pp.232-239, 2008 (Journal Indexed in SCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 22 Issue: 1
  • Publication Date: 2008
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.08.006
  • Title of Journal : TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
  • Page Numbers: pp.232-239
  • Keywords: MTT assay, ATP assay, chemotherapeutics, cyrotoxicity, in vitro, A549, LUMINESCENCE ASSAY, OVARIAN-CANCER, CHEMOSENSITIVITY ASSAY, TOXICITY ASSAYS, CELL-LINES, IN-VITRO, REDUCTION, APOPTOSIS, SURVIVAL, CYTOTOXICITY

Abstract

Accurate assessment of the anti-growth effects of chemotherapeutics is immensely importance in cancer research with regard to drug discovery and toxicological safety. A number of in vitro cytotoxicity assays are used for these purposes. However, there is the possibility for different results in the assessments because the way they measure the viability of cancer cells is specific to each assay. In the present study, the performance of two common assays (MTT and ATP) in the assessment of anti-growth effects of chemotherapeutics on a lung cancer cell line (A549) was compared. The cells were treated with paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), etoposide, doxorubicin, epirubicin, cisplatin, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4-HC) and carboplatin in six different concentrations. When taking all the drugs and inhibitions into account, a moderate correlation (r = 0.671); p = 0.01) between the assays was found. However, IC 50 values by the MTT assay were higher in 90% of the drugs than those found by the ATP assay. In addition to this, there was a statistically significant difference between the dose response curves of the assays, which was dependent on the drugs of choice. We recommend caution in comparing these assays to evaluate the anti-growth effects of chemotherapeutics because the MTT assay seem to give rise to relatively lower inhibition (higher viability) levels than the ATP assay, depending on the drugs of choice. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.