BURSA/YENİŞEHİR’DE BRÜTALİST BİR ANIT: DOSAN KONSERVE FABRİKASI
TÜBA-KED Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Cultural Inventory, cilt.33, ss.249-271, 2026 (TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 33
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.22520/tubaked.1698957
- Dergi Adı: TÜBA-KED Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Cultural Inventory
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: ERIHPlus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.249-271
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
A BRUTALIST MONUMENT IN BURSA / YENİŞEHİR:
DOSAN CANNING FACTORY
267
Architect Aydın Boysan, who graduated from the Academy of Fine Arts in 1945, occu-
pies a distinctive position in twentieth-century Turkish architectural history through his
innovative contributions to industrial architecture, structural design, construction tech-
nologies, and prefabrication practices. Although his professional oeuvre encompasses a wide range of
building typologies, industrial facilities constitute one of the most significant domains through which
his architectural identity can be understood. Boysan approached architecture as a discipline grounded
in rational thinking, technical knowledge, and constructive logic. According to his understanding,
materiality and structural systems form the alphabet of architectural grammar, while the load-bearing
structure constitutes the primary generator of architectural expression. For Boysan, successful archite-
ctural design requires a comprehensive understanding of structural mathematics, construction proces-
ses, material properties, economic constraints, and the requirements of human life. This perspective
reflects a modernist belief in the integration of technological knowledge and architectural creativity,
positioning structure not merely as a technical necessity but as a fundamental component of archite-
ctural meaning. Throughout his professional career, Boysan designed numerous industrial facilities in
different regions of Türkiye, particularly within the Marmara Region. These projects reveal a consistent
commitment to functional rationality, modular planning, and constructional efficiency. Boysan regar-
ded industrial buildings as the architectural typology in which the modernist dictum “form follows
function” could be most clearly and effectively realized. In his view, the rationalization and industria-
lization of building production were not only technical imperatives but also social necessities capable
of improving living and working conditions. Consequently, he adopted modular design principles that
simplified planning processes, facilitated construction, and enabled adaptability. The organization of
production halls, administrative offices, laboratories, meeting rooms, cafeterias, reception spaces, and
auxiliary facilities was often based on standardized planning systems that established coherent spatial
relationships across the industrial complex. An examination of Boysan’s industrial architecture demons-
trates a particular interest in the expressive potential of geometry and structural form. His projects
frequently employed the composition of diverse geometric elements to generate distinctive architec-
tural identities while maintaining functional efficiency. The resulting architectural language emerged
from a productive collaboration between architecture and engineering, allowing structural innovation
to become a visible and defining aspect of design. This approach aligns with broader international
developments in post-war architecture, particularly the emergence of Brutalism as a movement that
emphasized material authenticity, structural expression, and the ethical dimensions of architectural
production. Rather than concealing structural systems behind decorative surfaces, Boysan highlighted
their presence through carefully articulated forms and exposed construction techniques. In his work,
geometry, structure, and materiality function as interconnected components that communicate both
technical logic and aesthetic value. One of the most representative examples of Boysan’s architectural
philosophy is the Dosan Canning Factory, located in the Yenişehir district of Bursa and inaugurated
in June 1971. Designed as a comprehensive industrial complex, the factory embodies many of the
principles that characterize Boysan’s broader architectural approach. The architectural composition of
the complex is defined by the interaction of geometric forms organized within a coherent spatial and
structural system. Constructed primarily in reinforced concrete, the facility demonstrates how struc-
tural design can simultaneously fulfill functional requirements and generate architectural expression.
The formal language of the complex reveals a deliberate exploration of three-dimensional geometry,
producing a dynamic visual composition that distinguishes the factory from conventional industrial
facilities of its period.268 TÜBA-KED 33 / 2026
Gürkan OKUMUŞ & Özgür EDİZ
Drawing upon archival research and fieldwork, this study identifies the folded-plate shell structure
of the cafeteria building as one of the most significant architectural elements within the complex. The
sculptural character of this structure illustrates Boysan’s capacity to transform technical solutions into
expressive architectural forms. Beyond its structural efficiency, the folded-plate shell generates a power-
ful visual identity that contributes to the representational qualities of the industrial complex. Similar
concerns can be observed throughout the site, where the rational organization of production spaces
is complemented by an architectural language emphasizing structural visibility, material honesty, and
geometric articulation. The interaction of light and shadow across reinforced concrete surfaces, toget-
her with the incorporation of fiberglass components, further enhances the visual and spatial qualities of
the complex. The architectural character of the Dosan Canning Factory also reflects broader transfor-
mations within international architectural culture during the 1960s and early 1970s. The period wit-
nessed the emergence of more pluralistic architectural attitudes that challenged the formal uniformity
of earlier modernism while retaining its commitment to technological progress and rational design.
Within this context, the factory exhibits several characteristics commonly associated with Brutalist
architecture, including memorable and imageable forms, direct material expression, and the delibe-
rate exposure of structural systems. However, rather than reproducing international Brutalist models,
Boysan adapted these principles to local conditions, construction practices, and industrial require-
ments. The result is a distinctive architectural interpretation that demonstrates how global architectural
discourses were translated, negotiated, and reconfigured within the Turkish context. This article argues
that the Dosan Canning Factory represents a significant example of experimental industrial architec-
ture shaped by technological innovation, structural exploration, and a locally interpreted Brutalist aest-
hetic. Through an analysis of the building’s architectural language, structural organization, and design
principles, the study contributes to a broader understanding of the relationship between architectural
history, construction technologies, and industrial modernization in Türkiye. Furthermore, the research
highlights Boysan’s experimental design strategies and examines the ways in which international archi-
tectural ideas were reinterpreted within local industrial production. As an important yet largely over-
looked component of Türkiye’s modern architectural heritage, the factory offers valuable insights into
the intersections of architecture, technology, and industrial development during the post-war period.
Abandoned since 2010 and currently facing the threat of demolition, the Dosan Canning Factory
remains a critical document of twentieth-century industrial architecture. Its preservation is essential
not only because of its historical significance but also because it embodies a distinctive architectural
approach that integrated rational planning, structural innovation, and aesthetic experimentation. By
examining the factory through archival investigation, site analysis, and field research, this study seeks to
reveal the architectural value of the complex and to contribute to ongoing discussions concerning the
documentation, interpretation, and conservation of modern industrial heritage in Türkiye.
A BRUTALIST MONUMENT IN BURSA / YENİŞEHİR:
DOSAN CANNING FACTORY
267
Architect Aydın Boysan, who graduated from the Academy of Fine Arts in 1945, occu-
pies a distinctive position in twentieth-century Turkish architectural history through his
innovative contributions to industrial architecture, structural design, construction tech-
nologies, and prefabrication practices. Although his professional oeuvre encompasses a wide range of
building typologies, industrial facilities constitute one of the most significant domains through which
his architectural identity can be understood. Boysan approached architecture as a discipline grounded
in rational thinking, technical knowledge, and constructive logic. According to his understanding,
materiality and structural systems form the alphabet of architectural grammar, while the load-bearing
structure constitutes the primary generator of architectural expression. For Boysan, successful archite-
ctural design requires a comprehensive understanding of structural mathematics, construction proces-
ses, material properties, economic constraints, and the requirements of human life. This perspective
reflects a modernist belief in the integration of technological knowledge and architectural creativity,
positioning structure not merely as a technical necessity but as a fundamental component of archite-
ctural meaning. Throughout his professional career, Boysan designed numerous industrial facilities in
different regions of Türkiye, particularly within the Marmara Region. These projects reveal a consistent
commitment to functional rationality, modular planning, and constructional efficiency. Boysan regar-
ded industrial buildings as the architectural typology in which the modernist dictum “form follows
function” could be most clearly and effectively realized. In his view, the rationalization and industria-
lization of building production were not only technical imperatives but also social necessities capable
of improving living and working conditions. Consequently, he adopted modular design principles that
simplified planning processes, facilitated construction, and enabled adaptability. The organization of
production halls, administrative offices, laboratories, meeting rooms, cafeterias, reception spaces, and
auxiliary facilities was often based on standardized planning systems that established coherent spatial
relationships across the industrial complex. An examination of Boysan’s industrial architecture demons-
trates a particular interest in the expressive potential of geometry and structural form. His projects
frequently employed the composition of diverse geometric elements to generate distinctive architec-
tural identities while maintaining functional efficiency. The resulting architectural language emerged
from a productive collaboration between architecture and engineering, allowing structural innovation
to become a visible and defining aspect of design. This approach aligns with broader international
developments in post-war architecture, particularly the emergence of Brutalism as a movement that
emphasized material authenticity, structural expression, and the ethical dimensions of architectural
production. Rather than concealing structural systems behind decorative surfaces, Boysan highlighted
their presence through carefully articulated forms and exposed construction techniques. In his work,
geometry, structure, and materiality function as interconnected components that communicate both
technical logic and aesthetic value. One of the most representative examples of Boysan’s architectural
philosophy is the Dosan Canning Factory, located in the Yenişehir district of Bursa and inaugurated
in June 1971. Designed as a comprehensive industrial complex, the factory embodies many of the
principles that characterize Boysan’s broader architectural approach. The architectural composition of
the complex is defined by the interaction of geometric forms organized within a coherent spatial and
structural system. Constructed primarily in reinforced concrete, the facility demonstrates how struc-
tural design can simultaneously fulfill functional requirements and generate architectural expression.
The formal language of the complex reveals a deliberate exploration of three-dimensional geometry,
producing a dynamic visual composition that distinguishes the factory from conventional industrial
facilities of its period.268 TÜBA-KED 33 / 2026
Gürkan OKUMUŞ & Özgür EDİZ
Drawing upon archival research and fieldwork, this study identifies the folded-plate shell structure
of the cafeteria building as one of the most significant architectural elements within the complex. The
sculptural character of this structure illustrates Boysan’s capacity to transform technical solutions into
expressive architectural forms. Beyond its structural efficiency, the folded-plate shell generates a power-
ful visual identity that contributes to the representational qualities of the industrial complex. Similar
concerns can be observed throughout the site, where the rational organization of production spaces
is complemented by an architectural language emphasizing structural visibility, material honesty, and
geometric articulation. The interaction of light and shadow across reinforced concrete surfaces, toget-
her with the incorporation of fiberglass components, further enhances the visual and spatial qualities of
the complex. The architectural character of the Dosan Canning Factory also reflects broader transfor-
mations within international architectural culture during the 1960s and early 1970s. The period wit-
nessed the emergence of more pluralistic architectural attitudes that challenged the formal uniformity
of earlier modernism while retaining its commitment to technological progress and rational design.
Within this context, the factory exhibits several characteristics commonly associated with Brutalist
architecture, including memorable and imageable forms, direct material expression, and the delibe-
rate exposure of structural systems. However, rather than reproducing international Brutalist models,
Boysan adapted these principles to local conditions, construction practices, and industrial require-
ments. The result is a distinctive architectural interpretation that demonstrates how global architectural
discourses were translated, negotiated, and reconfigured within the Turkish context. This article argues
that the Dosan Canning Factory represents a significant example of experimental industrial architec-
ture shaped by technological innovation, structural exploration, and a locally interpreted Brutalist aest-
hetic. Through an analysis of the building’s architectural language, structural organization, and design
principles, the study contributes to a broader understanding of the relationship between architectural
history, construction technologies, and industrial modernization in Türkiye. Furthermore, the research
highlights Boysan’s experimental design strategies and examines the ways in which international archi-
tectural ideas were reinterpreted within local industrial production. As an important yet largely over-
looked component of Türkiye’s modern architectural heritage, the factory offers valuable insights into
the intersections of architecture, technology, and industrial development during the post-war period.
Abandoned since 2010 and currently facing the threat of demolition, the Dosan Canning Factory
remains a critical document of twentieth-century industrial architecture. Its preservation is essential
not only because of its historical significance but also because it embodies a distinctive architectural
approach that integrated rational planning, structural innovation, and aesthetic experimentation. By
examining the factory through archival investigation, site analysis, and field research, this study seeks to
reveal the architectural value of the complex and to contribute to ongoing discussions concerning the
documentation, interpretation, and conservation of modern industrial heritage in Türkiye.