Interpretable ensemble learning for predicting flexural and compressive strength of 3D-printable concrete: Linking mixture design, fiber characteristics, and aggregate effects
ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, cilt.84, ss.1-23, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 84
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jestch.2026.102583
- Dergi Adı: ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), INSPEC, Directory of Open Access Journals
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-23
- Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
The mechanical performance of three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) mixtures is governed by a complex
interaction between mixture composition, fiber characteristics, aggregate properties, and layer-wise deposition
effects. Although compressive strength (CS) has been widely investigated, flexural strength (FS) is equally critical
because printed elements are vulnerable to crack propagation, interlayer weakness, and direction-dependent
behaviour. This study develops interpretable machine learning models for the prediction of FS and CS of 3Dprintable
concrete using literature-derived experimental datasets. Extra Trees (ET), XGBoost, and Random
Forest (RF) models were trained using selected mixture, binder, admixture, fiber, and aggregate descriptors.
Recursive Feature Elimination and model hyperparameter optimization were integrated within a random search
procedure with 10-fold cross-validation and applied separately for each model and target variable. Model performance
was assessed using R2, MAE, RMSE, MAPE, actual-predicted plots, Taylor diagrams, and residual
analysis. SHAP analysis was then used to interpret the relative and directional effects of the selected variables. All
three models provided accurate predictions, with XGBoost showing the best cross-validation performance for
both FS and CS. XGBoost achieved independent-test R2 values of 0.9856 and 0.9781 for FS and CS, respectively,
with the corresponding MAE values of 0.5211 MPa and 2.8523 MPa. SHAP results showed that FS predictions
were influenced most strongly by water-reducing admixture content, water-to-binder ratio, fiber ratio, aggregate
mass, and fiber density. In contrast, CS predictions were influenced primarily by cement mass, water-to-binder
ratio, fiber ratio, and fiber density.