Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
EYE, cilt.39, sa.3, ss.586-592, 2025 (SCI-Expanded)
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone implantation in the supraciliary (SC) space, a novel and potential effective implantation site, compared to intravitreal (IV) application. Methods: This prospective study included 39 eyes of 38 patients with macular oedema (ME) who underwent SC and IV dexamethasone implantation (SC-DEX and IV-DEX). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups and followed for 3 months. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included maximum retinal thickness (MRT), change in central retinal thickness between consecutive visits (Delta CRT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Results: Both SC-DEX and IV-DEX groups showed significant MRT reductions during at follow-up. In the SC group, MRT significantly decreased at 1st and 3rd months (p = 0.0002 for both), but not at 1st week (p = 0.2517). In the IV-DEX group, significant reductions in MRT were observed at all postoperative visits: 1st week (p = 0.0002), 1st month (p = 0.0004), and 3rd month (p = 0.0003). There were no significant differences in the change in Delta CRT between the SC-DEX and IV-DEX groups at any visit (p > 0.05). IOP did not show significant changes (p > 0.05). BCVA improved significantly in the SC group compared to the IV-DEX group during the first week (p = 0.014). No other perioperative or postoperative sight-threatening complications were noted in either group, including hypotony or endophthalmitis. ConclusionS: C-DEX shows promise as an alternative for managing ME, offering similar effectiveness to IV-DEX with safe profile. Further studies are needed to confirm its long-term safety and efficacy.