Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
Kinesiology, cilt.56, sa.1, ss.163-172, 2024 (SCI-Expanded)
The higher the altitude, the higher the risk of hypoxia exposure. Good fitness status or aerobic capacity (AC) of persons with the military or civil aviation sector and those interested in high-altitude sports have been thought of great importance to encounter hypoxic risk. It is unclear whether a difference in maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) capacity would result in differential tolerance in hypoxia responses. The present study aims to determine the relationship between AC, anaerobic threshold (AT), respiratory compensation (RC), and time of useful consciousness (TUC) of people working in the military or civil aviation sector and those interested in high-altitude sports. Eighty-seven healthy males were recruited on a volunteer basis (age = 24.2 ± 1.6 years; height = 177.0 ± 5.1 cm; weight = 76.4 ± 8.1 kg). The 25000 feet test was applied to the participants in the hypobaric chamber. During the test, participants’ TUC levels were recorded. The Bruce protocol was used for the VO2max test, and the maximal oxygen consumption value, AT, and RC regions were recorded. Participants were divided into four groups according to their VO2max values. AT and RC values were higher in the group with high VO2max, although not significant (p>.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the TUC levels of the groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups’ TUC level, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and heart rate levels (p>.05). The results clearly show that there is no significant relationship between VO2max determined on the treadmill with a gas analyzer and TUC determined in the hypobaric chamber at 25000 feet. For future studies, the relationship between anaerobic capacity and hypoxia or studies in which different physical and physiological characteristics are evaluated together in the same participants may contribute to the literature.