A Single Bout of Foam Rolling After Nordic Hamstring Exercise Improves Flexibility but Has No Effect on Muscle Stiffness or Functional Muscle Parameters


Rodoplu C., Burger C., Fischer J., Manieu Seguel J., ARABACI R., Konrad A.

Medicina (Lithuania), cilt.61, sa.8, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 61 Sayı: 8
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/medicina61081486
  • Dergi Adı: Medicina (Lithuania)
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: eccentric exercise, muscle performance, range of motion, recovery
  • Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background and Objectives: The Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) effectively strengthens the hamstrings, reduces the risk of hamstring strain, and induces fatigue in the muscles; thus, post-NHE recovery strategies should be optimized. Foam rolling (FR) is a widely used method, with the belief that it can speed up recovery. Thus, this study investigated the acute and 48-h effects of FR following the NHE on muscle stiffness, pain pressure threshold (PPT), flexibility, countermovement jump (CmJ) height, and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two active males were randomly assigned to either an FR group (n = 16) or a passive recovery (PR, n = 16) group. Measurements were taken at three time points: pre-test, post-test_0h, and post-test_48h. Participants performed the NHE (3 sets × 10 reps) before the recovery interventions. Variables assessed included muscle stiffness (MyotonPro), flexibility (sit and reach), PPT (algometer), jump performance (force platform), and MVIC peak torque (dynamometer). Results: FR significantly improved acute flexibility (12.7%, p < 0.001) following the NHE and prevented flexibility loss at 48 h, compared to the PR group. However, FR showed no significant advantages over PR in terms of muscle stiffness, PPT, CmJ, or MVIC, both acutely and at 48 h (p > 0.05). Conclusions: FR is an effective acute recovery strategy for improving flexibility after the NHE but offers limited effects for muscle stiffness, PPT, and other functional muscle parameters, both acutely and at 48 h. Further research should explore the long-term effects and efficacy of FR across diverse populations and recovery scenarios.