Yenidunya, M. O. Et Al. 2000. A wound after contact between a child and a dog does not necessarily mean an animal bite [22]. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , vol.106, no.5 , 1227.

Yenidunya, M. O., Ozdengil, E., & Emsen, I., (2000). A wound after contact between a child and a dog does not necessarily mean an animal bite [22]. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , vol.106, no.5, 1227.

Yenidunya, MEHMET, E. Ozdengil, And I.M. Emsen. "A wound after contact between a child and a dog does not necessarily mean an animal bite [22]," Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , vol.106, no.5, 1227, 2000

Yenidunya, MEHMET O. Et Al. "A wound after contact between a child and a dog does not necessarily mean an animal bite [22]." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , vol.106, no.5, pp.1227, 2000

Yenidunya, M. O. Ozdengil, E. And Emsen, I. (2000) . "A wound after contact between a child and a dog does not necessarily mean an animal bite [22]." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery , vol.106, no.5, p.1227.

@article{article, author={MEHMET OĞUZ YENİDÜNYA Et Al. }, title={A wound after contact between a child and a dog does not necessarily mean an animal bite [22]}, journal={Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery}, year=2000, pages={1227} }